Miller v. Steele
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.
In this action, the appellees sued the- appellant, in a complaint of three paragraphs.
To each of these paragraphs the appellant demurred, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause o.f action. This demurrer was overruled, and the appellant excepted, and then answered in three paragraphs.
The appellees replied, by a general denial, to the second and third paragraphs of appellant’s answer.
The issues joined were tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned for the appellees.
*80The appellant’s motions for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment, were severally…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. McClamrock v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Rush v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Condit v. WinslowIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pollard v. BarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Chase v. BeesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.