State v. Craveiro
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, David Craveiro, II, appeals a decision of the Plymouth District Court (Samaha, J.) denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the stop of his automobile. We reverse and remand.
The following facts are contained in the record. The defendant was charged with operating after suspension, second offense. See RSA 263:64 (2004). Prior to trial, he filed a motion to suppress, alleging that his vehicle was stopped “on the sole basis of driving through a puddle.” The State filed an objection, arguing that the stop was justified under both the community caretaking and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HarrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- State v. D'AmourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. BoyleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. LicksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LABARRESupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. BeaucheminSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. BoutinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. NewcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State of New Hampshire v. Corey V. DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.