Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. J.Q.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 14, 1991Published

1Dissent

STERN, J.A.D.

(dissenting).

It is hard for me to disagree with a technically precise and well written opinion of the court. This is particularly true because I strongly believe that the criminal law must be approached with technical precision in an effort to assure equal justice. However, while I agree with much stated in the majority opinion, I am compelled to dissent in this case.

Prosecutors can be expected to remember their ethical responsibilities in assuring defendants a fair trial. But they cannot always be expected to offer evidence they believe in good faith to be reliable and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API