Legal Opinion

Hartsfield Co. v. Luddy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 31, 1932No. 22318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bboxles, O. J.

1. While, “under the provisions of section 5185 of the Civil Code (1910), it is the general rule that before any writ of certiorari shall issue, the party applying for the same shall give bond and security for all future costs and the eventual condemnation money, payable to the adverse party, and if he fails so to do the superior court does not acquire jurisdiction of the case” (Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Monroe, 26 Ga. App. 332, 106 S. E. 209), yet the general rule does not apply in its entirety in a cause where there is no eventual condemnation money in the case. In such a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holton v. HendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Atlanta v. PazolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API