Legal Opinion

City of Atlanta v. Pazol

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 1957No. 36633PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.

It is contended by the defendant in error that the proceeding before the Municipal Court of Atlanta was criminal or quasi criminal in nature and that on certiorari to the superior court, the proper bond was the one prescribed for criminal cases by Code § 19-214. This contention is without merit. The proceeding was under Code § 72-401. The defendant was notified of the hearing and was notified to show cause why the houses on her property should not be declared a nuisance and the same abated. She appeared, and evidence on both sides was heard, and the court ruled that the houses did constitute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Healey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. City of Atlanta v. StallingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. City of Atlanta v. StallingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Page v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Hartsfield Co. v. LuddyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Horne v. City of CordeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. MACON-BIBB COUNTY v. GREEN MEADOWS HOUSING PARTNERS, L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API