Legal Opinion

United States v. Janet Hallahan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 7, 2014No. 12-3748, 12-3787, 12-3750, 12-3781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIESBACH, District Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Janet and Nelson Hallahan engaged in a prolonged fraud that bilked investors out of more than $1,000,000. They pled guilty, as part * of plea agreements, to two counts of conspiracy. Rather than face sentencing for their crimes, the defendants chose to flee the district. They remained on the run for twelve years. After they were finally arrested, both pled guilty without a plea agreement to the additional crime of failing to appear for sentencing. At their long-delayed sentencing in 2012, the district court imposed above-guideline sentences of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HallahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Michael ValloneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. BethanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Janet HallahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API