Legal Opinion
Wuliger v. Positive Living Resources
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 19, 2006No. 3:04 CV 1479PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motions 1 to dismiss and Plaintiffs response thereto. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied.
Background
This is one of many cases arising out of viatical insurance litigation which has been ongoing since 1999, resulting in two investor classes and multiple criminal convictions. See Liberte v. Capwill, Case No. 5:99 CV 818 (N.D.Ohio). In that case Li-berte Capital Group (“Liberte”) and Alpha Capital Group (“Alpha”) charged that James A. Capwill (“Capwill”), through the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Herman Theunissen and Ann Theunissen v. Sid Matthews D/B/A Matthews Lumber TransferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 3M Company v. Premium Contractor Solution, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022