Legal Opinion

Keating v. Jastremski

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 9, 2020No. 3:15-cv-00057Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY L. KEATING ET AL., CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00057-L-AGS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING 13 v. PLAINTIFFS’/COUNTER- DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL 14 JOHN A. JASTREMSKI ET AL., (Doc. no. 438) 15 Defendants. 16 17 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 18 19 Pending before the Court in this action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets 20 is an unopposed motion filed by Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Jeremy Keating, 21 Richard P. Gigliotti, and Alexander J. Mele (collectively, the “Keating Group”) to seal 22 portions of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API