Legal Opinion

State v. Waterfield

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 27, 2011No. 20080949-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

248 P.3d 57 (2011)

2011 UT App 27

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Bryan WATERFIELD, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20080949-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

January 27, 2011.

Scott L. Wiggins, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Mark L. Shurtleff and Kenneth A. Bronston, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges McHUGH, ORME, and CHRISTIANSEN.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant argues that the district court erred in concluding that its April 14 and May 19, 2008, orders imposed illegal sentences. Because of this error, he claims, he was prevented from challenging his Residential Substance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KohlUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. JaegerUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RodriguesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CandedoUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. West Jordan City v. GoodmanUtah Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sasser v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API