Legal Opinion

People v. Orta

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 27, 2005No. 1-04-2442PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

A person charged with a crime has the right to expect his lawyer’s questions to prosecution witnesses will not help the State prove its accusation. In this case, the defendant’s lawyer elicited testimony from police officers that enabled the State to prove an essential element of its charge. For that reason, we reverse the defendant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and remand this cause for a new trial.

Following a bench trial, the defendant, Edwin Orta, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and sentenced to 10…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  2. People v. McNealAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. NatalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. People v. FernandezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API