Legal Opinion
Andersen v. Lindenbaum
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 11, 2007No. 05SC774PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
Nadine and Tony Andersen petitioned for review of the court of appeals' judgment in their medical malpractice action, affirming summary judgment for the defendant, Dr. Lindenbaum. See Andersen v. Lindenbaum, 131 P.3d 1154 (Colo.App.2005). The district court disregarded Ms. Andersen's contradictory affidavit as a sham and, relying instead on her earlier deposition testimony, found there to be no genuine dispute that she failed to bring her action within the statutory limitations period. Because Andersen's affidavit, however, plausibly explained that her deposition testimony was premised on a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Palazzo v. CorioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sanderson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gognat v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Hice v. LottColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Tarco, Inc. v. Conifer Metropolitan DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.