Wild v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
In this jury tried case, Consolidated Aluminum Corporation appeals from a $200,-000 judgment in favor of plaintiff Jerome Wild for personal injuries sustained in a fall from a ladder manufactured by defendant.
There are four allegations of error. First, that the trial court erred in denying Consolidated’s motion for mistrial, which was requested on the ground that Wild’s attorney’s remarks, during closing argument, were highly prejudicial and constituted a request for a judicial admission. We disagree, because the statement did not request a judicial admission of a fact and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Williams v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Higgins v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Hewitt v. MastersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Kinser v. ElkadiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arnold v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Lomax v. SewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Chilton v. GordenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Countryman v. Seymour R-II School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Empire District Electric Co. v. CoverdellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.