United States v. Holman
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as *566a general court-martial of violation of a lawful general regulation (by blackmarketing) and making a false official statement in violation of Articles 92 and 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 907 (1982) [hereinafter cited as UCMJ], He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for ten months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence.
A routine check of a computer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. VandelinderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. VietorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. WorkmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HarperU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991