Legal Opinion

C. H. Pitt Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1969No. Appeal, 3PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

C. H. Pitt Corporation (Pitt) owns and operates the Carlton House Hotel, which is situate on land abutting on part of Court Place, Sixth Avenue, Bigelow Boulevard and Grant Street in the City of Pittsburgh. Pitt is the named insured in a comprehensive liability insurance policy issued by the Insurance Company of North America (I.N.A.). In this policy the insurer agreed to pay to the insured all sums which it became “legally obligated to pay as damages because of personal injury ... or destruction of tangible property . . . caused by an occurrence1 . . . arising out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mains v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Bierkamp v. RubinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Loftus v. CarbondaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. S. G. S. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Thompson v. Medical Licensing BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API