Legal Opinion

McDonald v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 7, 1942No. 8278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

Appellant and Edith Gardner were convicted of conspiracy; she upon a plea of guilty, he, following a trial by jury. On this appeal it is contended that the District Court erred in admitting in evidence certain letters, papers and documents as proof of overt acts upon the part of appellant, without first having proved that appellant took part in a conspiracy. To support this contention appellant relies upon cases which hold that the conspiracy must have been entered into before the overt act was committed;1 that the gist of the offense is the meeting of minds for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Leo P. Reistroffer v. United States of America, W. L. Rogers v. United States of America, Marvin Norris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Commonwealth v. EspositoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Arthur v. Donaldson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API