Blaine v. Peters
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
A judgment was entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of appellant and against appellee on February 16, 1951. Appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative for a new trial, was filed February 21, 1951. By inadvertence this motion was immediately denied. Expressly because of this “inadvertence” the District Court on April 5, 1951 set aside the denial. The court then granted the motion for new trial which it had thus reinstated.
Appellant contends the order of April 5, and the court’s subsequent refusal to vacate it, violated Rule 59(d), F.R.Civ. P., 28…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Warner v. City of Bay St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Continental Oil Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- In the Matter of American Precision Vibrator Company, Debtor. American Precision Vibrator Company v. National Air Vibrator Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- William Kelly v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Beyer v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.