Stevens v. Plumas Eureka Annex Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
Plumas Eureka Annex Mining Company made and executed in writing a lease agreement by which there was leased to one Bourey mining property in Plumas County. In and by the terms of the agreement, a sum of ten thousand dollars was advanced, which amount defendant mining company agreed to pay. At the same time there was executed a deed of trust made by the company as grantor, P. J. Behneman and L. D. Byrne as trustees, and J. A. Talbot as beneficiary, to secure the performance of the terms and conditions of the lease, which had, in the meantime, been assigned and transferred by Bourey to said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mersfelder v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Baldwin v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Jose Realty Co. v. PavlicevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- David v. FrostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sierra-Bay Federal Land Bank Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- 6 Angels, Inc. v. Stuart-Wright Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.