Schultz v. State

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] For his part in a "road-rage" incident, Norbert Schultz was convicted of unlawful possession of a deadly weapon and two ' counts of aggravated assault and battery. In this appeal, he maintaing that the trial court made several erroneous evidentiary ruhngs mandating reversal. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Mr. Schultz states these two issues:

1. Did the court commit evidentiary errors that justify a new trial?

2. Did the cumulative effect of all trial errors adversely affect the Appellant's substantial rights?

FACTS

[¶ 18] Brandon and Zoey Peterson were driving on Interstate 80 from…