Annabel Kady, et al. v. Opencare, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANNABEL KADY, et al., Case No. 4:25-cv-05037-KAW 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 10 OPENCARE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 33 11 Defendant. 12 13 On January 14, 2026, Defendant Opencare, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the first amended 14 class action complaint (“FAC”). (Def.’s Mot., Dkt. No. 33.) 15 Upon review of the moving papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution 16 without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b),…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.