Legal Opinion

The People v. Hanza Muhammad

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2023No. 42Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 42 The People &c., Respondent, v. Hanza Muhammad, Appellant. Paul J. Connolly, for appellant. Bradley W. Oastler, for respondent. RIVERA, J.: The trial judge is in charge of the courtroom and is ultimately responsible for ensuring that any limitation on a defendant’s right to a public trial conforms with constitutional dictates. At defendant’s trial, the judge delegated to court officers the -1- -2- No. 42 implementation of the judge’s general policy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API