Legal Opinion
Johns Hopkins University v. Datascope Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 9, 2007No. Civil WDQ-05-0759, WDQ-06-2711PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM D. QUARLES, Jr., District Judge.
The Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”) and Arrow International, Inc., (“Arrow”) sued Datascope Corporation (“Datascope”) for patent infringement. Pending are the Plaintiffs’ motions for Judgment on Partial Findings and to Alter/Amend Judgment and the Defendant’s motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law and to Alter/Amend Judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on partial findings, the Plaintiffs’ and Datascope’s motions to amend, and will deny Datascope’s motions for judgment.
I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Johns Hopkins University v. Datascope Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- TruePosition Inc. v. ANDREW CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Belden Technologies Inc. v. Superior Essex Communications LPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Travel Tags, Inc. v. UV Color, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.