Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Franklin Institute of State of Pennsylvania

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 20, 1941No. Mechanics’ Lien, No. 47PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry, Judge.

It should not be contended that a subcontractor can sue an owner under our Mechanics’ Lien statute and not make the general contractor a party defendant, especially under the statement of claim as herein filed by the plaintiff. No privity of contract exists between the owner and the subcontractor. The general contractor is the link which connects the owner and the subcontractor. It is manifestly unjust to an owner against whom our statute operates with sufficient hardship, if properly and fairly construed, that, apart from the general contractor, he should be forced to defend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Green v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Simpson v. J. W. Black Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Casserly v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Iannoti v. KalmbacherSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
  5. Bombeck v. DevorssMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Delmar Drive-In Theatre, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. Deluca v. MartelliSuperior Court of Delaware · 1964
  3. Ceritano Brickwork, Inc. v. Kirkwood Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  4. Silverside Home Mart, Inc. v. HallSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. First Florida Building Corp. v. Robino-Ladd Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API