Schiselman v. United States Parole Commission

Pro se petitioner-appellant Michael J. Schiselman filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging procedures used by the United States Parole Commission in reopening his initial parole determination and conducting a special reconsideration hearing. On appeal from the dismissal of that petition, we reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded the case “with instructions to grant the petition unless the Parole Commission provides a new hearing ... within 60 days.” Schiselman v. United States Parole Commission, No. 85-2594, slip op. at 8 (7th…