Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Kluckhohn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 2, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal fr'om Plymouth District Gotirt. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

It is the claim of plaintiff that defendant permitted his dog to run at large without being muzzled, contrary to the provisions of an ordinance of the city of Le Mars, where the parties reside, and that while so at large, and while plaintiff was passing along a public street in said city, said dog ran against her seizing hold of her dress, knocking her down, and causing her serious bodily injury. The defendant answers, denying all the material averments of the petition. On trial to a jury verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff for $800, and from the judgment rendered thereon defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kearney v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Knapp & Co. v. CowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Broderick v. HigginsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Maggi v. CuttsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Luttermann v. RomeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Barnes v. GallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  3. Lloyd v. Alton Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API