Legal Opinion

Gray v. Case

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill to foreclose.

1Opinion of the Court

Bird, V. C.

The facts upon which this case is to be determined have been agreed upon by counsel, and are in substance as follows : Adair was the owner of the mortgaged premises in fee simple on the-2d day of March, 1868; on that day he made application to the-commissioners of the sinking fund for a loan of $6,000; on March 20th, 1868, he executed a bond for $6,000, and delivered it to said commissioners, and also a mortgage upon the-premises mentioned in the bill of complaint, to secure the payment of said bond, which said mortgage was recorded on the-28th day of March, 1868, in the clerk’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Leitch v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Hayden v. BucklinNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Morris v. GlaserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Wilson v. StevensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Sorg v. TowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. TRANSPORTATION COMM'R v. KastnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API