Legal Opinion
Infanzon v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2004No. 03-9565PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction, and we deny the petition for review. 1
Background
The record reflects that the immigration judge (IJ) denied petitioner’s application for asylum and withholding of removal on July 5, 1999. The IJ determined that petitioner, a Peruvian national, had failed to demonstrate the requirements for asylum and withholding of removal. Admin. R. at 276-81. On June 19, 2002, the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion, permitting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Riley v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Sarmadi v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Alzainati v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Rodas-Orellana v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Witjaksono v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Maatougui v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.