Pearson v. . Carr
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN, by the defendant in the cause, to re-open an account, heard before Shipp, Judge, at June Term, 1886, of Buncombe Superior Court. This case was before the Court at February Term, 1886, and is reported in the 94 N. 0., 567-574. The motion was refused, and the defendant appealed. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
In deciding the double appeal in this case, at the February Term, 1886, we used these words in concluding the opinion: “ The investigations of the referee have been careful, painstaking and thorough, and the results conveyed in his report. Under the correcting hand of the revising Court, his errors have been rectified ; and, in our opinion, substantial justice is meted out in the final judgment of the Court; and of this the plaintiffs have no just grounds for complaint.”
Thus every matter in controversy in the suit was adjusted, and the cause absolutely determined. When the action of this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bledsoe v. . Nixon .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Whissenhunt v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Burnett v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Grant v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Galbreath v. WallrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Credle v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.