Legal Opinion
M. S. v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2019No. 16-56472PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) appeals from the district court's Memorandum and Order reversing the administrative law judge's (ALJ) decision in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) action asserting the denial of a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 - 1482.
The district court correctly concluded that M.S. was denied a FAPE because LAUSD was required to consider whether a residential placement should be offered to M.S. for educational purposes as part of her individualized education plan (IEP) notwithstanding that another county…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- M.L., a Minor C.D., His Parent S.L., His Parent v. Federal Way School District Washington Superintendent of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- R.B. Ex Rel. F.B. v. Napa Valley Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- B.H. v. Manhattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- B.H. v. Manhattan Beach School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- J.B. v. Tuolumne County Superintendent of SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- W. v. Comal Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021