Erwin v. Harris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIABi.
This cause is before this court on motion to strike the briefs of the plaintiff in error and to dismiss this appeal for the reason said brief contains language of disrespect of and contempt for the trial court and to its judgment.
We have read the brief of the plaintiff in error, and find it contains language in violation of rule No. 23 of this court (87 Okla. xxii), and that it contains languagh of disrespect. for the trial court, impugning to him ulterior motives and contempt for his judgment. Rule No. 23 is as follows:
“No argument or motion filed or made in this court shall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Muncie & Portland Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Hoover v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Nephi Irrigation Co. v. VickersUtah Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gose v. City of DouglasWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Pancoast v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112 to 118Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932