Pancoast v. Eldridge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER, CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error has filed herein a brief in reply to the answer brief of the defendant in error. Following the filing of this brief, the defendant in error has filed a brief in response to the reply brief of the plaintiff in error, in which last-mentioned brief counsel for defendant in error makes a derogatory comparison of counsel for plaintiff in error with a witness in the ease whose credibility has been attacked by counsel for plaintiff in error, amounting to an insult. Plaintiff in error has filed his motion to strike the brief of defendant in error for the reason .game is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoover v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Erwin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112 to 118Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932