Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hassan v. Begley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2005No. 91A02-0501-CV-55Published

1DissentRiley, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Not only is summary judgment rarely granted in negli-genee actions when the sole issue is proximate cause, but especially in a medical malpractice case based upon negligence, summary judgment is seldom an appropriate disposition. Jones v. Minick, 697 N.E.2d 496, 499 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); Hoskins v. Sharp, 629 N.E.2d 1271, 1277 (Ind.Ct.App.1994), reh'g denied. That is, the issue of proximate cause is generally a question for the jury. State Street Duffy's, Inc. v. Loyd, 623 N.E.2d 1099 (Ind.Ct.App. 1993). This is particularly true when the critical question for resolution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. SharpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State Street Duffy's, Inc. v. LoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Brunner v. Trustees of Purdue UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Jones v. MinickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Barker v. Brownsburg Lumber Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API