Legal Opinion

Jonas & Naumburg Corp. v. Adu Tirdzniecibas Un Rupniecibas Akciju Sabiedriba " Michlin un Deli,"

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The defendant appeals from a resettled order and from a judgment entered pursuant to the prior order which was resettled. The judgment appealed from was entered against the defendant, a Latvian corporation, on the 4th day of September, 1926, and a copy thereof and notice of entry served on the defendant on the 7th day of September, 1926. The notice of appeal appearing in the printed record -is dated October 30, 1926. It thus appears that the statutory limitation of time within which an appeal may be taken expired on October 7, 1926, since an appeal from a judgment, to be effective, must be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Jonas & Naumburg Corp. v. MichlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaehler v. Phoenix InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API