Legal Opinion

Jonas & Naumburg Corp. v. Michlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

Is the plaintiff entitled to have the denials of the answer stricken out as sham and be granted judgment on the pleadings, or, in the alternative, be granted summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice? We are of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for upon both grounds of the motion.

The plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for breach of contract against a corporation known as Society Michlin & Sons, Ltd., organized under the laws of the Republic of Latvia and hereinafter referred to as the Latvian corporation. During the pendency of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erie County Savings Bank v. . CoitNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Blanding v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walter E. Heller & Company v. CoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  2. Metro Corrugated Containers, Inc. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  3. Jonas & Naumburg Corp. v. Adu Tirdzniecibas Un Rupniecibas Akciju Sabiedriba " Michlin un Deli,"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Resnick v. Keystone Sportswear Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API