Legal Opinion
State v. Ferraro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 22, 1972PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
The defendant has appealed to this court from his conviction by a jury of the crime of selling heroin in violation of §19-480 (a)-of the General Statutes. In his appeal he filed sixteen assignments of error. One of these has been expressly abandoned and another—that the court erred in denying his motion to set aside the verdict —is treated as abandoned since it was not briefed. State v. Keeler, 164 Conn. 42, 43, 316 A.2d 782; State v. Grayton, 163 Conn. 104, 109, 302 A.2d 246; State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 635, 211 A.2d 143.
We turn first to the defendant’s extensive attack on the finding.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. GraytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Heating Acceptance Corporation v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. DeFreitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. BlydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. MoyeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.