Reiger v. Worth
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil, ActiON by A. W. Reiger against the Worth Company, heard by Judge E. W. Tirnberlahe and a jury, at Fall Term, 1899, of Brunswick Superior Court. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages of defendant on account of a breach of warranty, the form of the action being that formerly known as “case.” The plaintiff bought of the defendant a quantity of rice, which he alleged the defendant represented to be good seed rice, but which was in fact not good seed rice, and which failed to sprout after having been planted, *231although the land was well prepared. The plaintiff further alleged that it was too late, after he discovered that the rice was worthless for seed, and had failed to germinate, to plant for another crop. The jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Wyck v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- MacE v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Foard v. Atlantic & North Carolina Rail RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
- Bridgers v. . DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Boyle v. . ReederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Vaughan's Seed Store v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- E. P. Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Sprout v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Baumgartner v. GlesenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.