Legal Opinion

Empire Beauty School v. Bell

Virginia Circuit Court

Decided August 9, 2001No. Case No. (Garnishment) CV-000054-01PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Randall G. Johnson

At the hearing on July 26, the court [was asked] to determine whether a Pennsylvania judgment was properly domesticated in Virginia. When the request was made, counsel for the plaintiff-creditor was holding funds from a garnishment summons issued on the judgment. During a recess, counsel and the parties agreed that the funds being held represented social security benefits exempt from garnishment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 407, and they were delivered to Bell. Counsel for both parties asked the court to render a decision anyway since the judgment creditor would be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reisen v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Landcraft Co., Inc. v. KincaidSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. Preston v. KindrickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  4. Washington v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Sutherland v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abdulhadi v. Bavarian Auto Sales, L.L.C.Goochland County Circuit Court · 2013
  2. Gosp v. McAuliffeFairfax County Circuit Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API