Legal Opinion
Kingsbury Breweries Co. v. Schechter
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1956No. Civ. No. 2693PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced action on an account stated. Defendants counterclaimed for breach of contract1 and the only fact issues submitted to the jury had to do with the parol contract relied on by defendants. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The matter is now before the Court on defendants’ motion- for a new trial.
The record is replete with contradictions in the testimony of the parties. It appears from the testimony of defendant *221Irving E. Schechter that he was the only active defendant and the principal witness testifying to establish the contract pleaded in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- A. Santaella & Co. v. Otto F. Lange Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Iowa Fruit & Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Bendix Home Appliances, Inc. v. Radio Accessories Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Bailey v. AustrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nordin v. ZimmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Megarry Bros. v. United States ex rel. Midwestern Electric Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Megarry Brothers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968