Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rio Grande Gas Company v. Stahmann Farms, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1969No. 8595Published

1DissentMoise, Justice

I am unable to agree with the opinion of the majority and the disposition of the case made by them.

My disagreement arises out of the states ment to the effect that the “judgment by the injured persons against Rio Grande alone does not operate as a discharge of other joint tortfeasors.” In the posture of this case, I am inclined to think that it would discharge them and, if so, the result reached concerning the right to seek contribution is incorrect. I recognize, of course, that Stahmann was absolved of guilt, but on this appeal Rio Grande asserts this was error.

Section 24-1-13, N.M.S.A.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hilbert v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Grantham v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Falls Industries, Inc. v. Consolidated Chemical Industries, Inc., and D. C. Hall Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Gray v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hackett v. HysonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API