Legal Opinion
State v. Loeffler
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 26, 1982No. Nos. 81-717 to 81-722 and 81-724PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMES, Judge.
This opinion focuses on the concept of standing to challenge allegedly illegal searches and arrests in the context of a state appeal from an order granting motions to suppress physical evidence and identifications.
The state charged Vance Loeffler, Norman DeJong and Nanette Ritter with possession of methaqualone. In addition, it charged appellees Loeffler and Ritter with sale of methaqualone, use of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and carrying a concealed firearm, and it charged appellee DeJong with possession of marijuana. All three moved to suppress the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. CableSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Cable v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009