In re Dean
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentBerdon, J.
Let me first state what this case is not about. The conduct of the respondent, Judge Harold H. Dean, as specifically found by the judicial review council (review council), “did not affect his judicial duties or responsibilities” in any way. Indeed, there is no claim by the review council that Judge Dean ever did anything illegal or immoral during the time period investigated by the review council or at any time during his many years on the bench. What he did do in attempting to resolve his substantial financial problems, which resulted from real estate development ventures that he invested in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re ZoarskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Matter of DalessandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In re FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Council on Probate Judicial Conduct re: KinsellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Matter of GlanceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.