Legal Opinion

Matter of Glancey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1987No. 116 and 118PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

This matter compels us to address the question of whether the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination may be validly asserted by a judge in this Commonwealth, to avoid making financial disclosures mandated by a pre-existing order of this Court and designed to preserve the integrity and impartiality of our judicial system. That question and others of constitutional dimension are here presented in a challenge to the validity of our removing from office two judges, for invoking the privilege instead of making the required financial disclosures.

Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Matter of GlanceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Matter of ChioveroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Glancey v. COM., STATE EMP. RET. BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API