Matter of Glancey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This matter compels us to address the question of whether the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination may be validly asserted by a judge in this Commonwealth, to avoid making financial disclosures mandated by a pre-existing order of this Court and designed to preserve the integrity and impartiality of our judicial system. That question and others of constitutional dimension are here presented in a challenge to the validity of our removing from office two judges, for invoking the privilege instead of making the required financial disclosures.
Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Matter of GlanceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Matter of ChioveroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Glancey v. COM., STATE EMP. RET. BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.