State v. Casey
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Chief Judge:
Howard Casey was convicted of driving under the influence (DUI). He appeals the trial court’s denial of his Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), motion challenging five of the State’s peremptory strikes. We affirm.
I
At the close of jury selection, Casey moved under Batson to challenge the State’s exercise of all of its peremptory strikes against male venirepersons. At the hearing on Casey’s motion, the court asked the solicitor to provide a “sex neutral reason” for the challenges. The solicitor stated that three of the males (Nos. 7, 215,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HaiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.