Legal Opinion

Valley Bank v. Monarch Investment Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1990No. 18031-18033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a tale of two checks. The first check was issued by the purchasers of a stolen backhoe to the scoundrel who sold them the backhoe. The scoundrel endorsed the check without authority and cashed it at the purchasers’ bank. The second check was a cashier’s check issued by the bank in exchange for the first check. The second check was used by the scoundrel to buy some gold coins from a coin company.

The primary questions presented and our answers are:

1. Was the bank that cashed the first check based on the scoundrel’s unauthorized indorsement entitled to charge the account…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Land Title & Trust Co. v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Robinson v. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 331 MinidokaIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Winter v. NobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Uriola v. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sony Corp. of America v. American Express Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Title Ins. Co. v. Comerica Bank-CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Valley Bank v. Monarch Investment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API