Legal Opinion

Young v. SOUTHERN MICA CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1953No. 161Published

1Opinion of the Court

75 S.E.2d 795 (1953)

237 N.C. 644

YOUNG et al.

v.

SOUTHERN MICA CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA, Inc.

No. 161.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 1953.

W. E. Anglin, Burnsville, for plaintiffs, appellees.

Fouts & Watson, Burnsville, for defendant, appellant.

JOHNSON, Justice.

First, the defendant insists that its motion for judgment as of nonsuit should have been allowed.

Here the defendant relies on the clause in the lease which provides that it shall not be liable to the plaintiffs "for any waste material dropped on their lands while in transit through the flume lines * * * "; whereas the plaintiffs point…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kohl v. LehlbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Raub v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Wassum v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Baxter v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. State v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API