Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Rush
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 2003PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*239OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
This appeal presents two issues for our review. The threshold question is whether the action of the Town of Southampton Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review is ripe for judicial review. If so, we must then address whether the Board was bound by the prior negative declaration issued by the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) acting as lead agency in a coordinated State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) review. We hold that the action of the Board is ripe for review and that the Board is bound by the prior negative declaration.
Storms during…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Essex County v. ZagataNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- MATTER OF MERSON v. McNallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gordon v. RushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Association for a Better Long Island, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Stop-The-Barge v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jones v. AmiconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- New York Blue Line Council, Inc. v. Adirondak Park AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v. VecchioNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.