Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1984No. JM-226Published

1Opinion of the Court

i . . The Attorney General of Texas JIM MAlTOX November 5. I984 lttorney General NonorAble Lloyd Doggsrt Opinion No. JX-226 -upmeme cowl BulldIng 0.80x 12sB ChAirmEn Al”. lx. n711. zE4B Subcodttee on ConAm6r AffAirr Be: Whether Article 1175. 6ec- 512l47525Dl Texnr, Store Senate tion 19, V.T.C.S., authorize6 -elex B1074. 1367 P. 0. Box 12068, Capitol Station A home rule city to adopt And lIocOpl*r 512l475-0255 Auatinr Ta.6 78711 enforce regulatloa6 which Arc .pplicAble outnide city limit6 ‘14 J6ckmm. Suit. 700 and vhich provide 6tandarde for Iah*. TX. 75202-4505 the Eafe 6torAge of hArardou6…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Brookside Village v. ComeauTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nuclear Engineering Company v. William J. Scott, Illinois Ex Rel. William J. Scott v. Nuclear Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Dudding v. Automatic Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Vianello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API