Legal Opinion

Pohrman v. Klamath County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 1976No. 73-280E, CA 3997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

This is a landowner’s appeal from a zoning decision of the Klamath County Board of Commissioners (Board). Plaintiff owns an interest in about 3400 acres purchased in 1970. At that time, there was neither a comprehensive plan nor a zoning ordinance applicable to the property. Both a comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance were adopted in 1972. Both designated plaintiff’s land as AF (agricultural-forestry). Plaintiff intended to develop the property as a "recreational subdivision” with 20-acre lots. Such a use is not permitted in the AF zone.

Plaintiff, and others acting on his behalf, protested…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marracci v. City of ScappooseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Columbia Hills Development Co. v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Webber v. SkokoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1977
  4. Greb v. BD. OF COM'RS FOR CTY. OF KLAMATHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS v. Monticello Drug Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API