Brittan v. Oakland Bank of Savings
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Alameda. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
After a demurrer to the original complaint had been sustained by the court the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Upon the motion of the *2defendant the court struck out certain portions of this amended complaint on the ground that they were irrelevant and redundant. Thereafter the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, to which the defendant answered, and' subsequently, having obtained an order substituting the appellant for the original plaintiff in the action, filed a third amended and supplemental complaint, to which the defendant filed its answer, denying many of the allegations in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ganceart v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gale & Elliott v. Tuolumne Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Whipley v. FlowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by14 opinions
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sheehy v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.