Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eastland Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 28, 1937No. 6772, 6773Published

1Dissent

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

I dissent. As I understand the facts the witnesses were heard and the argument had before Commissioners Gary, Brown and Sykes, but the decision was rendered by Commissioners Sykes, Case and Prall.'

Two modes of procedure are available under the statute. Under Section 409 (a) [48 Stat. 1096, 47 U.S.C.A. § 409 (a) (Supp.1936)] it is required that “In all cases heard by an examiner the Commission shall hear oral arguments on the request of either party.” Under Section 309 (a) [48 Stat. 1085, 47 U.S.C.A. § 309 (a) (Supp.1936)], where no hearing before an examiner is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quon Quon Poy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Louie Lung Gooey v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States Ex Rel. Minuto v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. United States ex rel. Chin Cheung Nai v. CorsiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API