Legal Opinion

Riley v. Riley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 17, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review. Having reviewed the record, we are satisfied that the Mary C. Riley Trust should be reformed, as a matter of Massachusetts law, to conform to the settlor’s intent. By dividing the Family Trust (nonmarital trust within the Mary C. Riley Trust) into two trusts with identical provisions, the trustees can take full advantage of the $1,000,000 exemption from the generation skipping transfer tax. We have allowed this type of division in prior cases where, as here, it has been demonstrated that the trust instrument as written fails…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. BankBoston v. MarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Hillman v. HillmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. First Agricultural Bank v. CoxeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Fleet National Bank v. MackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. VirussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Fleet National Bank v. MarquisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Inderieden v. DownsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Pierce v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Bindman v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API